Bus Rapid Transit - The Ashton Vale Route - Questions and Answers

Monday, 09 June 2008

Mark Bradshaw (Executive Member for Sustainable Development) answers questions from Peter Goodwin (Green Party) at the Public Forum of Bristol City Cabinet on 29th May 2008.

Q1. Will 'car-free' conditions be included in the design brief for any part of the Ashton urban extension that lies within Bristol's city boundary, to encourage the modal shift in transport toward more sustainable modes like the proposed rapid transit?

A1. I would like to see the urban extension provide an exemplar in terms of sustainability and transport choices. This should be designed to minimise the need for motorised transport, with good walking and cycling networks and convenient access to public transport. It is possible that 'car free' proposals could form part of this. I am confident that a combination of good design, good quality networks and the application of the council's transport development control standards will encourage the use of sustainable transport while allowing choice for occupants. By clarifying the phasing of rapid transit to provide an early link between Long Ashton and Temple Meads, we have sent a clear message about sustainable transport choices.

Q2. Are any representations being made by the council to encourage North Somerset to incorporate substantial 'car-free' measures into the design brief for the Ashton 'urban extension', given its potential impact on Bristol's traffic problems ?

A2. Both I and officers in the council are in dialogue with our North Somerset counterparts on this issue through a variety of forums. I know that they share our desire to make this development as sustainable as possible and minimise the impact of the development on traffic in Bristol and elsewhere and I believe the design will reflect these wishes. Officers have also participated in a series of workshop events organised by North Somerset and I have taken part in one of the events recently.

Q3. Is there a firm commitment to put in a TIF bid for a bus rapid transit system between the centre and Ashton this autumn, or is there an option to take more time to consider alternative routes or innovative types of rapid transit if they promise a better chance of 'getting it right'?

A3. It remains the intention to submit a major scheme bid for rapid transit to serve this corridor this autumn. The work being carried out includes an appraisal of alternative routes and alternative technologies, as required by government guidance. Alongside this detailed technical work is a need to keep in mind the goal of providing attractive and affordable transport choices to everyday car use.

Q4. In view of the council's resolution on April 1st to "oppose [rapid transit] route proposals which undermine the current and future expansion of walking and cycling in Bristol", can you give an assurance that current West of England plans for a rapid transit system between the Centre and Ashton will not affect the width or the character of the Chocolate Path alongside the New Cut?

A4. I can assure you that the rapid transit options being considered neither affect the width nor fundamentally alter the character of the Chocolate Path; indeed it is proposed that there will be many improvements to the walking and cycling route, particularly in relation to Sustrans Connect2 scheme. We are committed to working with key stakeholders in order to maximise the benefits for local residents, public transport users, cyclists and pedestrians. I hope you will welcome this clear message.