|
A series of further questions to Cabinet member Dennis Brown, still attempting to find out what the Ring Road's for, and related questions. Put by Peter Goodwin of S. Bristol Green Party:
1. Developer Contributions
Has there been any intimation from Bristol International Airport that their expansion plans would be more viable with the construction of a South Bristol Ring Road, and, in particular, that they foresee themselves making a substantial 'developer contribution' toward its cost?
Reply: The Bristol International Airport Master Plan 2006-2030 published in November 2006 notes that the South Bristol Ring Road will be of particular benefit to airport users, but does not quantify to what extent, if any, this will make its expansion plans more viable. I am not aware that BIA has yet foreseen making a substantial contribution to the cost of the Ring Road, and indeed it is arguing that their expansion will have only a minor impact on local congestion, though it is willing to pay a proportionate contribution to any works required to improve traffic flow on the A38 outside the airport. It is, of course, possible that the issue of more substantial contributions could emerge as individual planning applications are brought forward.
2. Alternatives to Road Building
a) Is consideration of 'a wide range of alternatives' (which you mentioned in your reply of 28th September) still to come - or does the Director of Planning's statement "consultation regarding the principles of alternative transport strategies has already been carried out as part of the the GBSTS" (circulated to members more recently) mean that it has already passed us by?
Reply: Evidence of consideration of a wide range of alternatives is still required by the Department for Transport as part of the appraisal required in support of a future bid for funding and this work is still to be carried out. The Director's statement to members simply noted that some consultation on the broad principles of alternative strategies has already been carried out. There will clearly be further consultation at the appropriate time.
b) Can you advise what social, economic and environmental objectives any 'alternatives' must fulfill if they are to provide a real alternative to the construction of a South Bristol Ring Road?
[Note: this question was initially e-mailed to the leader and yourself on October 1 following the cabinet meeting, and a reply was promised]
Reply: As stated in my previous reply on this matter, the criteria that must be fulfilled when developing a business case for any scheme for government funding approval are laid down in extensive and detailed government guidance which can be accessed from the Department for Transport website.
c) In making a cost comparison between a Ring Road and its alternatives, would developer contributions (e.g. from BIA, or housebuilders) be first deducted from the anticipated cost of a Ring Road?
Reply: Economic appraisal of transport investment schemes is complex. In receiving a bid for public finance for a scheme, the government will be interested in the total cost of a scheme to the public purse (i.e. net of any developers' contributions). However, in making decisions it will also be interested in the ratio of total costs of the scheme from whatever source to the overall benefits to society.
Note: In an effort to get clarification of the answer given (or not!) at 2b, a supplementary question was put:
"In the absence of any indication of what the road is for, despite repeated questioning, should I take the answer you have given to Cllr Holland's question as being an accurate statement - viz, that 'it will help reduce congestion within Bristol but (more than anything) will be of particular significance to South Bristol by finally opening up the full economic potential of this neglected part of Bristol'?"
Reply: Yes, among other things.
|